Skip to navigation | Skip to main content | Skip to footer

Financial incentives may improve hospital mortality rates, says study

08 Nov 2012

New research into controversial pay-for-performance schemes has suggested they may help to save the lives of NHS patients.

The pay-for-performance scheme led to 890 fewer deaths over 18 months.

A “significant” fall in mortality rates for certain conditions emerged in a study into the use of incentives at hospitals in the North West of England.

Economists and health experts from the Universities of Manchester, Nottingham, Birmingham and Cambridge examined how the introduction of a scheme that paid bonuses to hospitals based on measures of quality affected the delivery of care.

The initiative was found to be associated with a saving of almost 900 lives over 18 months.

Lead author Matt Sutton, Professor of Health Economics in The University of Manchester’s Institute for Population Health, said: “Researchers have generally concluded that paying bonuses to hospitals for improving quality of care does not affect patient health. 

“We examined a unique initiative in which a bonus system from the US was adopted only in North West of England. We found that while research has shown the US scheme had no effect on patient health, the same scheme in the NHS did and resulted in 890 lives being saved during the 18 month scheme.”

The research team suggests a number of reasons for this:

  • The bonuses in the UK were larger than in the US and there was a greater probability of earning a bonus.
  • Despite the competitive nature of the programme, staff met regularly within the region to share problems and ideas of best practice.
  • In the US, these schemes are voluntary and only 5% of hospitals take part, whereas all hospitals in the North West of England took part in the scheme.

The research focused on Advancing Quality, a scheme introduced in 2008 at all 24 NHS hospitals providing emergency care in the North West. The first of its kind in England, the initiative required each hospital to submit data on 28 quality measures concerning five clinical conditions.

The researchers examined mortality rates for three of these five specified clinical conditions – pneumonia, heart failure and myocardial infarction. They compared the figures for in-hospital deaths within 30 days of admission in the 18 months before and after the scheme’s introduction.

The combined decrease for all three conditions was 1.3%, the equivalent of a 6% relative reduction – or some 890 lives. The study concludes that the possibility of incentives having a “substantial” effect on reducing deaths in NHS hospitals cannot be ruled out.

Co-author Ruth McDonald, Professor of Health Innovation and Learning at Nottingham University Business School, claimed the findings could have major policy implications.

She said: “Pay-for-performance schemes are being widely adopted, yet until now there’s been little evidence that they improve patient outcomes.

“Our findings suggest they can make a positive and significant difference but that, whether they do so, depends very much on how they’re designed and implemented.”

Performance-related bonuses totalling £3.2m were paid out at the end of the first year, with a further £1.6m following six months later. It was agreed from the outset that the money would be allocated to top-performing clinical teams to invest in further improvements in care.

In total, information for nearly a million patients – including more than 134,000 at the hospitals that took part in the scheme – was examined.

A nationwide pay-for-performance system based on withholding payments rather than paying bonuses now operates at all NHS hospitals.

Professor McDonald added: “These schemes can seem very simple on paper, but in practice they can be very difficult to implement successfully.”

Ends

Notes for editors

A copy of the paper, ‘Association between Mortality and Hospital Pay for Performance in England,’ by Martin Roland et al, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, is available on request.

About Advancing Quality:

Advancing Quality aims to give patients a better experience of the NHS by ensuring the highest standards of care are consistently delivered.

Operating in specific clinical areas, the programme incentivises changes in behaviour through robust data collection and reporting; an ethos of shared learning and collaboration; a commitment to transparency and openness; and incentives to reward demonstrated improvements

The programme launched in October 2008 and is now live in 32 North West provider trusts. It originally focused on five clinical areas:

  • Heart Failure
  • Heart Bypass Surgery (also referred to as Coronary Artery Bypass Graft or CABG)
  • Heart Attack (also referred to as Acute Myocardial Infarction or AMI)
  • Hip and Knee replacement surgery
  • Pneumonia

Following the initial success of Advancing Quality, the programme was extended in two stages:

  • October 2010 – stroke services
  • January 2011 – dementia and first episode psychosis.

Results are publicly reported once a year via www.advancingqualitynw.nhs.uk. The latest results (covering April 2011 – March 2012) will be released on Wednesday, 14 November 2012.

For further information contact:

Aeron Haworth
Media Relations
Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences
The University of Manchester

Tel: 0161 275 8383
Mob: 07717 881563
Email: aeron.haworth@manchester.ac.uk