In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Risk assessment following self-harm: comparison of mental health nurses and psychiatrists.

Murphy, Elizabeth; Kapur, Navneet; Webb, Roger; Cooper, Jayne

Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011;67(1):127-39.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

This paper is a report of a study conducted to compare risk assessments by psychiatrists and mental health nurses following an episode of self-harm.Self-harm assessments by nurses and psychiatrists are similar in terms of overall content, but risk assessment may vary by professional discipline. To our knowledge previous researchers have not compared the positive predictive value of risk assessments by nurses and psychiatrists, the factors that inform those assessments in clinical practice or the management of people assessed as being at high risk.We conducted a prospective cohort study (2002-2006) of 3491 individuals presenting with self-harm to three hospitals in the North West of England. A standard assessment form including detailed demographic and clinical data was completed by the assessing psychiatrist or nurse.The positive predictive value of risk assessments for self-harm repetition was 25% (95% CI: 20-31) among nurses and 23% (95% CI: 13-37) among psychiatrists. There was strong agreement on factors associated with high risk assessment by both professions. Following assessment of high risk, psychiatrists were much more likely than nurses to admit people for inpatient treatment (RR=5.6, 95% CI: 3.2-9.7). This difference remained highly statistically significant after controlling for case-mix differences (RR=4.3, 95% CI: 2.4-7.7).Our finding that risk assessments were comparable by profession supports the provision of nurse-led assessment services. However, inpatient admission was influenced largely by assessor type rather than patient characteristics. This has important implications for equity of care and may reflect professional differences in referral practices.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
England
Volume:
67
Issue:
1
Pagination:
127-39
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05484.x
Pubmed Identifier:
20969616
Funder acknowledgement:
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:107712
Created by:
Donaldson, Iain
Created:
18th January, 2011, 10:05:13
Last modified by:
Cooper, Jayne
Last modified:
14th August, 2012, 19:03:34

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.