Search the site

The University of Manchester Library

In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Productivity in Morphological Negation: a corpus-based approach

Hulse, Victoria

[Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2011.

Access to files

Abstract

This thesis investigates morphological productivity, which is among one of the most contentious issues in the field of Linguistics (Aronoff, 1976; Plag, 1999; Bauer, 2001). The advent of electronic corpora sparked fresh interest in productivity, notably the highly innovative measures proposed by Baayen and his co-writers (Baayen, 1989; Baayen and Lieber, 1991; Baayen and Renouf, 1996) which advocate the use of hapax legomena (once-occurring words in a corpus). This research re-investigates these methods to pinpoint the degree to which hapaxes represent new words of the language and, therefore, are valid indicators of productivity. The study also develops a more fine-grained method for measuring productivity, based on the re-analysis of the previously-tried methodologies.The case study for this research is negative prefixation. A database of all negatively-prefixed words in the British National Corpus is created and relevant variables, such as types, tokens and hapaxes, are examined to determine which combination provides the most pertinent measure. The thesis also comments on the relative productivity of the negative prefixes and therefore considers appropriate historical and semantic factors.Findings show that though hapaxes do provide access to neologisms, they are not the same phenomenon and cannot, therefore, be seen as a direct reflection of productivity. Significantly, it was discovered that while hapaxes typically include a proportion of neologisms, this proportion varies considerably from affix to affix. The proposed new formulae for measuring productivity - neologism/type and neologism/token - both point towards the prefix non- being the most productive of the five investigated, while in- is the least productive. Findings are also presented about the distribution of the negative prefixes across word class, an area which has never previously been examined in terms of morphological productivity.

Additional content not available electronically

CD containing The Database and The Hapax Sample

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Administered thesis
Form of thesis:
Traditional
Type of submission:
Doctoral level ETD - final
Thesis title:
Productivity in Morphological Negation: a corpus-based approach
Degree type:
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree programme:
PhD Education (72)
Publication date:
2011-02-15T12:36:50
Institution:
The University of Manchester
Location:
Manchester, UK
Total pages:
229
Abstract:
This thesis investigates morphological productivity, which is among one of the most contentious issues in the field of Linguistics (Aronoff, 1976; Plag, 1999; Bauer, 2001). The advent of electronic corpora sparked fresh interest in productivity, notably the highly innovative measures proposed by Baayen and his co-writers (Baayen, 1989; Baayen and Lieber, 1991; Baayen and Renouf, 1996) which advocate the use of hapax legomena (once-occurring words in a corpus). This research re-investigates these methods to pinpoint the degree to which hapaxes represent new words of the language and, therefore, are valid indicators of productivity. The study also develops a more fine-grained method for measuring productivity, based on the re-analysis of the previously-tried methodologies.The case study for this research is negative prefixation. A database of all negatively-prefixed words in the British National Corpus is created and relevant variables, such as types, tokens and hapaxes, are examined to determine which combination provides the most pertinent measure. The thesis also comments on the relative productivity of the negative prefixes and therefore considers appropriate historical and semantic factors.Findings show that though hapaxes do provide access to neologisms, they are not the same phenomenon and cannot, therefore, be seen as a direct reflection of productivity. Significantly, it was discovered that while hapaxes typically include a proportion of neologisms, this proportion varies considerably from affix to affix. The proposed new formulae for measuring productivity - neologism/type and neologism/token - both point towards the prefix non- being the most productive of the five investigated, while in- is the least productive. Findings are also presented about the distribution of the negative prefixes across word class, an area which has never previously been examined in terms of morphological productivity.
Additional digital content not deposited electronically:
CD containing The Database and The Hapax Sample
Thesis main supervisor(s):
Thesis co-supervisor(s):
Degree grantor:
Language:
en

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):
Academic department(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:118782
Created by:
Hulse, Victoria
Created:
15th February, 2011, 12:36:51
Last modified by:
Hulse, Victoria
Last modified:
1st July, 2015, 13:02:47

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.