In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Delays, what delays? A critical review of the literature on delays in construction

Farhad Eizakshiry, Paul W Chan and Margaret Emsley

In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ARCOM conference, Bristol. Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 5-7 September 2011: Association of Researchers in Construction Management; 05 Sep 2011-07 Sep 2011; Bristol. 2011. p. 839-848.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Use our list of Related resources to find this item elsewhere. Alternatively, request a copy from the Library's Document supply service.

Abstract

Despite a wealth of research into the causes and impacts of delays in construction, time and cost overruns remain a perennial problem in the construction industry. In this critical review, the literature on delays in construction is revisited with a view to inject fresh perspectives of the problem. Early studies have adopted rational, naturalistic positions to explain structural characteristics that lead to project delays. These studies tend to place primacy on what contractors can do to manage and eradicate delays, and usually take the planned project time for granted. Recent attempts have been made to articulate the possibility of strategic misrepresentation that could result in under-estimation of project time and costs, which in turn creates a perceived delay. Through the review, it was found that the intentions of the multitude of actors involved in delivering construction projects remain a relatively under-researched area, especially during the fuzzy-front-end of the project life cycle. A case is made for the need to study how intentions of different project stakeholders in the early stages of the project could potentially create unintended delays. Specifically, a number of critical questions was raised, including how stakeholder intentions are collectively constituted, and whether stakeholder intentions materially influences planned and achieved schedules in projects.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Type of conference contribution:
Publication date:
Conference title:
Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Conference venue:
Bristol
Conference start date:
2011-09-05
Conference end date:
2011-09-07
Proceedings start page:
839
Proceedings end page:
848
Proceedings pagination:
839-848
Contribution total pages:
10
Abstract:
Despite a wealth of research into the causes and impacts of delays in construction, time and cost overruns remain a perennial problem in the construction industry. In this critical review, the literature on delays in construction is revisited with a view to inject fresh perspectives of the problem. Early studies have adopted rational, naturalistic positions to explain structural characteristics that lead to project delays. These studies tend to place primacy on what contractors can do to manage and eradicate delays, and usually take the planned project time for granted. Recent attempts have been made to articulate the possibility of strategic misrepresentation that could result in under-estimation of project time and costs, which in turn creates a perceived delay. Through the review, it was found that the intentions of the multitude of actors involved in delivering construction projects remain a relatively under-researched area, especially during the fuzzy-front-end of the project life cycle. A case is made for the need to study how intentions of different project stakeholders in the early stages of the project could potentially create unintended delays. Specifically, a number of critical questions was raised, including how stakeholder intentions are collectively constituted, and whether stakeholder intentions materially influences planned and achieved schedules in projects.
Proceedings' volume:
2

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:133286
Created by:
Chan, Paul
Created:
14th October, 2011, 14:53:13
Last modified by:
Chan, Paul
Last modified:
7th January, 2014, 22:49:15

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.