In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Measurement of variability in sound field audiometry due to subject movement.

Beynon, G J; Munro, K J

British journal of audiology. 1995;29(5):285-91.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Sound field audiometry is used primarily for hearing assessment in young children and for functional hearing aid evaluation. It is important that measurements are accurate and reliable as they affect the management of patients. Most clinics use a substitution method for calibration and, as a result, if the subject moves from the calibrated test point, the sound pressure level (SPL) at the ears will vary as the sound field is very rarely uniform. This variation can result in inaccurate threshold estimation and increased test-retest variability. A commonly used method for evaluating the potential errors due to subject movement involves measuring the variation in SPL, with respect to the test point, at six points around the test point. This method makes assumptions about the sound field which may not be valid and could lead to an underestimation of the variation present. The aim of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of this method. Measurements of variation were taken with a microphone and repeated with a head and torso simulator (HATS) which was used to represent a test subject. The total degree of variation indicated by these two methods was compared. The microphone measurements indicated less variation than the HATS measurements. The differences were statistically significant but small in clinical terms. Assuming that the HATS is properly representative of the normal population, then this result indicates that simple microphone measurements are acceptable for normal clinical practice but that higher quality measurements are desirable for critical work.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Author(s):
Published date:
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
ENGLAND
Volume:
29
Issue:
5
Pagination:
285-91
Pubmed Identifier:
8838551
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:146797
Created by:
Munro, Kevin
Created:
10th January, 2012, 12:16:08
Last modified by:
Munro, Kevin
Last modified:
10th January, 2012, 12:16:08

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.