In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Self-reported outcome in new hearing aid users over a 24-week post-fitting period.

Munro, Kevin J; Lutman, Mark E

International journal of audiology. 2004;43(10):555-62.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Evidence for the existence of auditory acclimatization is mixed, and the implications for clinical practice are unclear. The aim of this study was to seek evidence of perceived changes in performance over a 24-week post-fitting period. Thirty-two new, elderly subjects were recruited and fitted monaurally with the same model of linear, programmable hearing aid that provided in excess of 20-dB insertion gain at 2000-4000 Hz. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP) was used to measure self-reported changes over time. The questions concerning benefit and satisfaction were modified to produce two versions: half of the subjects reported changes relative to the time of fitting, while the remainder reported changes relative to the previous occasion on which they completed the GHABP (3 weeks earlier). Subjects reported using hearing aids in excess of 90% of the time when in listening situations that cause difficulty. The median residual disability measure from the GHABP remained low (10-20%) over the duration of the study. The median scores for additional benefit and satisfaction showed a small but statistically significant improvement over the first 3 months of hearing aid use but only for the subjects who referenced this to their perceived performance 3 weeks earlier. The limited evidence for self-reported improvements in benefit and satisfaction over time reported to date must be tempered by the possibility of response bias arising from the method used to measure changes over time.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication status:
Accepted
Publication type:
Published date:
Language:
eng
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
England
Volume:
43
Issue:
10
Pagination:
555-62
Pubmed Identifier:
15724519
Attached files embargo period:
Immediate release
Attached files release date:
9th October, 2014
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:146798
Created by:
Munro, Kevin
Created:
10th January, 2012, 12:16:08
Last modified by:
Munro, Kevin
Last modified:
9th October, 2014, 11:25:35

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.