Related resources
Full-text held externally
Search for item elsewhere
University researcher(s)
The identification of special educational needs and the month of birth: differential effects of category of need and level of assessment
Garry Squires, Neil Humphrey, Alexandra Barlow & Michael Wigelsworth
European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2012;27(4):469.
Access to files
Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:
Full-text held externally
Abstract
The processes around the identification of special educational needs (SEN) should mean that those pupils who need most help, receive it. However, there are concerns that this process is not working and there is an over-identification of pupils with SEN. Previous international research has shown that summer born children are more likely to be identified as having SEN. However, these studies tend to treat SEN as a homogenous group. In this paper, we explore the extent to which the month-of-birth effect can be seen in subgroups of SEN. A survey of 450 schools in England was undertaken to explore the levels of provision and categories of SEN for 15,640 pupils. This led to differential month-of-birth effects being noted in category of SEN, with moderate learning difficulties being most susceptible. We hypothesise that teachers may be labelling younger children within the year group on the basis of political aspirations of attainments to be reached by the end of the academic year. When more thorough, multi-professional assessments are undertaken, the month-of-birth effect is no longer evident. This has clear implications for assessment; identification; allocation of scarce educational resources; for educational policy on monitoring school performance; and, initial teacher training.
Keyword(s)
assessment; category of special educational need; differential effects; identification; level of support; moderate learning difficulties; month of birth; special educational need