In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

Full-text held externally

University researcher(s)

    Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study.

    McNulty, Cliodna; Joshi, Puja; Butler, Chris C; Atkinson, Lou; Nichols, Tom; Hogan, Angela; French, David

    BMJ open. 2012;2(2):e000674.

    Access to files

    Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

    Full-text held externally

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the H1N1 influenza pandemic on the public's expectations for a general practice consultation and antibiotic for acute respiratory illness. DESIGN: Mixed methods. PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative interviews: 17 participants with acute respiratory tract infection (RTI) visiting English pharmacies. Face-to-face survey: about 1700 adults aged 15 years and older were recruited from households in England in January 2008, 2009 and 2011. RESULTS: The qualitative data indicated that the general public had either forgotten about the 'swine flu' (H1N1 influenza) pandemic or it did not concern them as it had not affected them directly or affected their management of their current RTI illness. Between 2009 and 2011, we found that there was little or no change in people's expectations for antibiotics for runny nose, colds, sore throat or cough, but people's expectations for antibiotics for flu increased (26%-32%, p=0.004). Of the 1000 respondents in 2011 with an RTI in the previous 6 months, 13% reported that they took care of themselves without contacting their general practitioners and would not have done so before the pandemic, 9% reported that they had contacted their doctor's surgery and would not have done so before the pandemic and 0.6% stated that they had asked for antibiotics and would not have done so before the pandemic. In 2011, of 123 respondents with a young child (0-4 years) having an RTI in the previous 6 months, 7.4% requested antibiotics and would not have done so before the pandemic. Unprompted, 20% of respondents thought Tamiflu© (oseltamivir) was a vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations of the general public for a consultation or antibiotics with an RTI are similar now to before the H1N1 influenza pandemic; therefore, public antibiotic campaign messages and general practice advice to patients can remain unchanged. Parents with young children and those with personal experience of the H1N1 influenza are more likely to consult and will need more reassurance. The public need more education about Tamiflu©.

    Bibliographic metadata

    Type of resource:
    Content type:
    Publication type:
    Publication form:
    Published date:
    Journal title:
    Abbreviated journal title:
    ISSN:
    Place of publication:
    England
    Volume:
    2
    Issue:
    2
    Pagination:
    e000674
    Digital Object Identifier:
    10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000674
    Pubmed Identifier:
    22457479
    Pii Identifier:
    bmjopen-2011-000674
    Access state:
    Active

    Institutional metadata

    University researcher(s):

    Record metadata

    Manchester eScholar ID:
    uk-ac-man-scw:173336
    Created by:
    Mcgiveron, Kerrie
    Created:
    5th October, 2012, 13:58:29
    Last modified by:
    French, David
    Last modified:
    6th March, 2013, 12:06:01

    Can we help?

    The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.