In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

Full-text held externally

University researcher(s)

Improvement in asthma endpoints when aiming for total control: salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate alone.

Woodcock, Ashley A; Bagdonas, Alfredas; Boonsawat, Watchara; Gibbs, Michael R; Bousquet, Jean; Bateman, Eric D;

Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group. 2007;16(3):155-61.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the magnitude of change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and rescue beta2-agonist use, when the aim of treatment is to achieve guideline-defined control. METHODS: This was a protocol-defined analysis of data from the previously-reported one-year, stratified, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group GOAL study comparing the use of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with fluticasone propionate alone in achieving guideline-defined control; this analysis assessed the magnitude of change in single specific endpoints which were amalgamated into the composite measure of control used in the primary GOAL analysis. RESULTS: Across all strata, improvements were seen for each outcome at 52 weeks as compared to baseline: mean morning PEF, 58.2 l/min (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate) versus 33.9 l/min (fluticasone propionate alone); symptom scores, -1.0 versus -0.8; symptom-free days, 72.5% versus 54.5%; mean of zero night awakenings, 31% versus 22%; rescue-free days, 87.3 versus 74.7; annualised rate of severe exacerbations, 0.02 versus 0.03; p<0.001 for all treatment differences. CONCLUSIONS: Aiming for guideline-defined control resulted in sustained, clinically relevant improvements in a range of individual asthma outcomes. Improvements were greatest with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate alone.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Published date:
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
Netherlands
Volume:
16
Issue:
3
Pagination:
155-61
Digital Object Identifier:
doi:10.3132/pcrj.2007.00043
Pubmed Identifier:
17551661
Pii Identifier:
SG00042
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):
Academic department(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:194100
Created by:
Heydon, Kirsty
Created:
7th May, 2013, 08:50:16
Last modified by:
Heydon, Kirsty
Last modified:
7th July, 2014, 18:19:47

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.