Related resources
Full-text held externally
- PMID: 19220924
- UKPMCID: 19220924
- DOI: 10.1017/S0305000909009350
Search for item elsewhere
University researcher(s)
Academic department(s)
Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?
Kirjavainen, Minna; Theakston, Anna; Lieven, Elena
Journal of child language. 2009;36(5):1091-114.
Access to files
Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:
Full-text held externally
- PMID: 19220924
- UKPMCID: 19220924
- DOI: 10.1017/S0305000909009350
Abstract
English-speaking children make pronoun case errors producing utterances where accusative pronouns are used in nominative contexts (me do it). We investigate whether complex utterances in the input (Let me do it) might explain the origin of these errors. Longitudinal naturalistic data from seventeen English-speaking two- to four-year-olds was searched for 1psg accusative-for-nominative case errors and for all 1psg preverbal pronominal contexts. Their caregivers' data was also searched for 1psg preverbal pronominal contexts. The data show that the children's proportional use of me-for-I errors correlated with their caregivers' proportional use of me in 1psg preverbal contexts. Furthermore, the verbs that children produced in me-error utterances appeared in complex sentences containing me in the input more often than verbs that did not appear in me-for-I errors in the children's speech. These findings are discussed in the context of current explanations for children's case marking errors.