Related resources
Full-text held externally
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.02.001
- PMID: 23719076
- UKPMCID: 23719076
Search for item elsewhere
University researcher(s)
Academic department(s)
Osteoarthritis: a review of strengths and weaknesses of different imaging options.
Guermazi, Ali; Hayashi, Daichi; Roemer, Frank W; Felson, David T
Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America. 2013;39(3):567-91.
Access to files
Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:
Full-text held externally
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.02.001
- PMID: 23719076
- UKPMCID: 23719076
Abstract
Slowing of radiographic joint space narrowing represents the only recommended imaging-based outcome measure to assess structural disease progression in osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials. There are no effective disease-modifying OA drugs. The ability of magnetic resonance (MR) to image structures within the knee and to visualize cartilage morphology and composition gives MR imaging a critical role in understanding the natural history of the disease and in the search for therapies. In this article, the roles and limitations of conventional radiography and MR imaging, focusing on knee OA, and the use of other modalities in clinical practice and OA research are described.