In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Forearm bone geometry and mineral content in UK women of European and South-Asian origin.

Ward K, Roy D, Pye SR, O'Neill TW, Berry JL, Swarbrick C, Silman AJ, Adams J

Bone. 2007;41(1):117-121.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Ethnic variation in areal bone mineral density (BMD) has been well documented. Such variation may, however, reflects differences in bone geometry rather than volumetric BMD (vBMD). The aim of the study was to compare bone geometry, mineral content (BMC) and vBMD in two ethnic groups, and study the influence of body size, physical activity, reproductive variables, 25 hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) and parathormone (PTH) status on any observed differences. The data were from a population-based, cross-sectional survey of peak bone mass in South Asian and European women, the population consisted 230 pre-menopausal South Asian (n=118, mean age 28.6+/-4.6 years) and European (n=112, mean age 30+/-4.3 years) women of UK origin. Women who participated completed an interviewer assisted questionnaire, had blood taken for assessment of 25(OH)D and PTH and had measurements of their distal (4%) and diaphyseal (50%) radius geometry, BMC and vBMD using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. At the 50% radius, South Asians had lower vBMD (p<0.001), BMC (p<0.001), cortical area (p<0.001), cortical thickness (p<0.001), cross-sectional area (p=0.04) and increased medullary area (p<0.04). Cross-sectional muscle area and stress strain index, however, were not different. Adjustment for age, height and weight attenuated, the difference in cross-section area but did not account for any of the other observed differences. Further adjustment for reproductive variables a physical activity index, 25(OH)D and PTH, attenuated ethnic differences in cortical BMC, area and thickness which became non-significant; however, ethnic differences in cortical vBMD and medullary area persisted. At the 4% site, after adjusting for age, height and weight, there was no difference in total area, total or trabecular vBMD between ethnic groups. After further adjustment for physical activity, reproductive variables, 25(OH)D and PTH, trabecular vBMD was higher in the South Asians. In conclusion, there are differences in bone geometry, BMC and vBMD at the radial diaphysis between UK South Asians and Europeans which are not explained by differences in body size. Polar stress-strain index was similar, however, suggesting no important differences in bone strength.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
United States
Volume:
41
Issue:
1
Pagination:
117-121
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1016/j.bone.2007.03.013
Access state:
Active

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d16571
Created:
30th August, 2009, 14:00:44
Last modified by:
Ingram, Mary
Last modified:
18th November, 2012, 15:23:46

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.