In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

A comparison of word versus sentence cues as therapy for verb naming in aphasia

Conroy P, Sage KE, Lambon Ralph MA

Aphasiology. 2009;23(4):462-482.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Background: Improving verb naming in people with aphasia should enable expression of a wider range of sentence types and meanings, and may have wider benefits for connected speech. Establishing the optimal therapy methods for improving verb naming is, therefore, of substantial clinical importance.Aims: This study investigated whether cueing sentence production would improve verb-naming accuracy to a greater extent than the more typical, single-word verb-cueing therapies. A second aim was to examine the extent to which verb picture naming improvements would generalise to naming of the same items in dynamic videos.Methods & Procedures: Seven participants with chronic aphasia including word retrieval impairment took part in a case-series study. Decreasing cues were used to devise two therapies to improve verb naming: word cue therapy and sentence cue therapy. A total of 60 verbs that had not been named accurately in baseline testing on three presentations were collated for each participant. These were split into three sets of 20 verbs: set A was used in word cue therapy, set B in sentence cue therapy, and set C served as control items undergoing no therapy. The sets were matched for significant psycholinguistic variables such as word frequency, imageability, length, and number of noun arguments. Therapy consisted of 10 sessions over 5 weeks. Post-therapy assessments consisted of an immediate naming assessment (1 week following therapy) and a follow-up assessment 5 weeks later. Naming of the target verbs in set A for each participant was also assessed using a dynamic video presentation.Outcomes & Results: Both therapies resulted in highly significant gains in naming accuracy for treated verbs with little, if any, carry-over to untreated verbs. There were no significant differences between the therapies for individual participants. At the group level there was a significantly greater benefit for word cue over sentence cue therapy at the follow-up naming assessment. The gains in verb naming post therapy generalised from the static depictions used in therapy to naming of the same items in the dynamic video presentation format.Conclusions: Both word and sentence cue therapy for verb naming were effective in improving naming accuracy. Gains from word cue therapy can generalise to naming of very different exemplars of the same verb targets. Word cue therapy resulted in significantly greater gains than sentence cues at the level of the group, but the difference was not substantial enough to be significant at the individual participant level. Generalisation, as an effect following intervention, can be examined in terms of naming different exemplars of a word, as well as its more typical meaning of generalisation from treated to untreated items in therapy.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
4
Volume:
23
Issue:
4
Start page:
462
End page:
482
Total:
21
Pagination:
462-482
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1080/02687030802514920
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d18086
Created:
30th August, 2009, 14:43:17
Last modified by:
Conroy, Paul
Last modified:
26th October, 2015, 19:21:35

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.