In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients receiving repeat prescriptions in general practice.

Zermansky A, Petty D, Raynor D, Freemantle N, Vail A, Lowe C

BMJ. 2001;323( 7325).

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Use our list of Related resources to find this item elsewhere. Alternatively, request a copy from the Library's Document supply service.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a pharmacist can effectively review repeat prescriptions through consultations with elderly patients in general practice. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist against normal general practice review. SETTING: Four general practices. PARTICIPANTS: 1188 patients aged 65 or over who were receiving at least one repeat prescription and living in the community. INTERVENTION: Patients were invited to a consultation at which the pharmacist reviewed their medical conditions and current treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of changes to repeat prescriptions over one year, drug costs, and use of healthcare services. RESULTS: 590 (97%) patients in the intervention group were reviewed compared with 233 (44%) in the control group. Patients seen by the pharmacist were more likely to have changes made to their repeat prescriptions (mean number of changes per patient 2.2 v 1.9; difference=0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.57; P=0.02). Monthly drug costs rose in both groups over the year, but the rise was less in the intervention group (mean difference 4.72 pound sterling per 28 days, - 7.04 pound sterling to - 2.41 pound sterling); equivalent to 61 pound sterling per patient a year. Intervention patients had a smaller rise in the number of drugs prescribed (0.2 v 0.4; mean difference -0.2, -0.4 to -0.1). There was no evidence that review of treatment by the pharmacist affected practice consultation rates, outpatient consultations, hospital admissions, or death rate. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical pharmacist can conduct effective consultations with elderly patients in general practice to review their drugs. Such review results in significant changes in patients' drugs and saves more than the cost of the intervention without affecting the workload of general practitioners.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Journal title:
BMJ
ISSN:
Place of publication:
England
Volume:
323( 7325)
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d21057
Created:
30th August, 2009, 15:58:19
Last modified by:
Vail, Andy
Last modified:
3rd February, 2011, 15:08:06

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.