In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Potential population impact of changes in heroin treatment and smoking prevalence rates: using Population Impact Measures.

Torun P, Heller RF, Verma A

Eur J Public Health. 2009;.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Background: The drug misuse and asthma are major health problems in urban settings. There are effective interventions to reduce cigarette smoking and also to treat heroin use; in the context of European System of Urban Health Indicators Project (EURO-URHIS), we explored the use of Population Impact Measures (PIMs) to describe the potential for increase in methadone use and reduction in cigarette smoking to reduce deaths -from heroin use- and asthma events in examples of urban populations. Methods: The two PIMs calculated here are the Number of Events Prevented in your Population (NEPP) and the Population Impact Number of Eliminating (or reducing the prevalence of) a Risk Factor (PIN-ER-t). Results: Increasing methadone treatment uptake from its current levels to 90% would prevent 21 (95% CI: 11–34) deaths in Manchester City, 218 (95% CI: 114–339) in Greater London and overall 1 243 (95% CI: 641–1953) in England in 1 year. In males 2 (95% CI: –22 to 28), 27 (95% CI: –296 to 363) and 170 (95% CI: –1757 to 2186) and in females 36 (95% CI: 6–70), 0 and 2312 (95% CI: 934–3783) fewer asthma cases per year would have been expected in Manchester City, Greater London and overall in England respectively, if the smoking prevalence is reduced from current levels to 20% in both sexes. Conclusions: PIMs provide estimates of absolute risk and benefit to a total population, of potential use to policy-makers since current practice and intervention goals are taken into account.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication status:
Published
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Journal title:
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1093/eurpub/ckn103
Related website(s):
  • Related website http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/28.full.pdf+html
Attached files embargo period:
Immediate release
Attached files release date:
23rd April, 2014
Access state:
Active

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d21651
Created:
30th August, 2009, 16:13:04
Last modified by:
Verma, Arpana
Last modified:
23rd April, 2014, 13:52:30

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.