In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, Reid F, Nelson L, Smith A

BJOG. 2006;113( 9):1007-13.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Use our list of Related resources to find this item elsewhere. Alternatively, request a copy from the Library's Document supply service.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of open and laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. Women were randomised between March 1999 and February 2002 and were seen for assessment at 6, 12 and 24 months, postoperatively. SETTING: Women were recruited from six gynaecology units in the UK. POPULATION: Women with proven stress urinary incontinence requiring surgery. METHODS: Open abdominal retropubic colposuspension or laparoscopic colposuspension. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were subjective (satisfaction with outcome) and objective (negative 1-hour pad test). Secondary outcomes were operative and postoperative morbidity and quality of life. The study was powered to demonstrate noninferiority, i.e. that the absolute cure rate of laparoscopic colposuspension was no more than 15% below that of open colposuspension. RESULTS: A total of 291 women were randomised, with 24-month data on subjective and objective outcomes in 88 and 82.5%, respectively. The intention-to-treat analysis indicated no significant difference in cure rates between open and laparoscopic surgery. The objective cure rates for open and laparoscopic were 70.1 and 79.7%, respectively. Subjective cure rates by satisfaction were lower than objective cure; 54.6 and 54.9%, respectively, and there was considerable nonconcordance both ways. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colposuspension is not inferior to open colposuspension in terms of curing stress urinary incontinence.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Published date:
Journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
England
Volume:
113( 9)
Start page:
1007
End page:
13
Pagination:
1007-13
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d31365
Created:
2nd September, 2009, 13:55:21
Last modified:
11th April, 2016, 09:04:07

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.