Related resources
Search for item elsewhere
University researcher(s)
Academic department(s)
Interval timing in mice does not rely upon the circadian pacemaker.
Lewis PA, Miall R, Daan S, Kacelnik A
Neurosci Lett. 2003;348( 3):131-4.
Access to files
Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Use our list of Related resources to find this item elsewhere. Alternatively, request a copy from the Library's Document supply service.
Abstract
The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is a precise timekeeper that controls and synchronizes the circadian period of countless physiological and behavioural functions and entrains them to the 24 h light/dark cycle. We examined the possibility that it is also indirectly involved in measurement of a briefer interval by observing the effects of lesions targeted at the SCN, and abolishing circadian rhythmicity, upon interval timing behaviour. Fourteen house mice (Mus musculus) were trained to estimate a 10 s interval using a modified peak procedure, and then underwent electrolytic lesions. Six individuals became behaviourally arrhythmic. Peak interval performance was then assessed in 12:12 light/dark conditions and in constant darkness. No significant change in peak characteristics was observed as a consequence of the lesion for either rhythmic or arrhythmic groups. These results show that the accurate measurement of 10 s requires neither a functioning circadian pacemaker nor entrained behavioural rhythmicity.
Keyword(s)
Animals; Darkness; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Time Factors; methods: Lighting; physiology: Biological Clocks; physiology: Circadian Rhythm; physiology: Conditioning, Operant