In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Communication between secondary and primary care following self-harm: are National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines being met?

Cooper, J., Murphy, E., Jordan, R. & Mackway-Jones, Kevin

Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2008;7( 1).

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Most patients contact their general practitioner (GP) following presentation to an Emergency Department (ED) after a self-harm incident, and strategies to help GPs manage these patients include efficient communication between services. The aim of this study was to assess the standard of documentation and communication to primary care from secondary care as recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the short-term management of people who self-harm. METHODS: An audit of medical records (ED and Psychiatric) on people aged 16 years and over who had presented to the ED following self-harm, benchmarked according to government guidelines, was performed. Data were collected over a 4-week period at a general teaching hospital. RESULTS: We collected data on 93 consecutive episodes of self-harm; 62% of episodes were communicated to primary care, 58% of these communications were within 24 h and most within 3 days. Patient identifying details and follow-up arrangements were specified in most cases. Communication via psychiatric staff was most detailed. ED clinicians provided few communications and were of limited content. Communication with the patient's GP was not made in half of those cases seen by a mental health specialist. CONCLUSIONS: Government guidelines are only partially being met. Reliance on communication by ED staff would leave a substantial proportion of patients discharged from the ED with no or minimal communication to primary care. Psychiatric services need to improve the rate of communication to the patient's GP following assessment. A national sample of National Health Service (NHS) trusts would establish if this is a problem elsewhere.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Published date:
Journal title:
ISSN:
Volume:
7( 1)
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1186/1744-859X-7-21
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d32612
Created:
2nd September, 2009, 14:31:04
Last modified by:
Gordon, Matthew
Last modified:
14th August, 2012, 19:03:11

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.