In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Diagnostic accuracy of markers for prodromal Alzheimer's disease in independent clinical series

Prestia, A; Caroli, A; Herholz, K; Reiman, E; Chen, K; Jagust, W J; Frisoni, G B

Alzheimers Dement. 2013;.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To capitalize on data from different clinical series to compare sensitivity and specificity of individual biomarkers for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Medial temporal atrophy, cortical hypometabolism, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers were assessed in 18 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with prodromal AD (pAD; conversion time, 26 +/- 12 months) and 18 stable MCI (sMCI) patients from the Translational Outpatient Memory Clinic cohort, as well as in 24 pAD patients (conversion time, 36 +/- 12 months) and 33 sMCI patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. Medial temporal atrophy was measured by manual, semi-automated, and automated hippocampal volumetry; cortical hypometabolism was measured using several indices of AD-related hypometabolism pattern; and cerebrospinal fluid markers were amyloid beta (Abeta)42 and total tau protein concentrations. For each biomarker, sensitivity for pAD, specificity for sMCI, and diagnostic accuracy were computed. RESULTS: Sensitivity to predict MCI conversion to AD in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Translational Outpatient Memory Clinic cohorts was 79% and 94% based on Abeta42, 46% and 28% based on hippocampal volumes, 33% to 66% and 56% to 78% based on different hypometabolism indices, and 46% and 61% based on total tau levels, respectively. Specificity to exclude sMCI was 27% and 50% based on Abeta42, 76% and 94% based on hippocampal volumes, 58% to 67% and 55% to 83% based on different hypometabolism indices, and 61% and 83% based on total tau levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that Abeta42 concentrations and hippocampal volumes may be used in combination to best identify pAD.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Published date:
Language:
eng
Journal title:
Digital Object Identifier:
S1552-5260(12)02527-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.016
ISI Accession Number:
23375562
Related website(s):
  • Related website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23375562
General notes:
  • Prestia, Annapaola Caroli, Anna Herholz, Karl Reiman, Eric Chen, Kewei Jagust, William J Frisoni, Giovanni B Translational Outpatient Memory Clinic Working Group Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Journal article Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan 30. pii: S1552-5260(12)02527-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.016.
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:202438
Created by:
Herholz, Karl
Created:
25th July, 2013, 14:53:05
Last modified by:
Herholz, Karl
Last modified:
25th July, 2013, 14:53:05

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.