In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

University researcher(s)

    Academic department(s)

    Using phylogenetics and model selection to investigate the evolution of RNA genes in genomic alignments.

    Allen, James

    [Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2013.

    Access to files

    Abstract

    The diversity and range of the biological functions of non-coding RNA molecules (ncRNA) have only recently been realised, and phylogenetic analysis of the RNA genes that define these molecules can provide important insights into the evolutionary pressures acting on RNA genes, and can lead to a better understanding of the structure and function of ncRNA. An appropriate dataset is fundamental to any evolutionary analysis, and because existing RNA alignments are unsuitable, I describe a software pipeline to derive RNA gene datasets from genomic alignments. RNA gene prediction software has not previously been evaluated on such sets of known RNA genes, and I find that two popular methods fail to predict the genes in approximately half of the alignments. In addition, high numbers of predictions are made in flanking regions that lack RNA genes, and these results provide motivation for subsequent phylogenetic analyses, because a better understanding of RNA gene evolution should lead to improved methods of prediction.I analyse the RNA gene alignments with a range of evolutionary models of substitution and examine which models best describe the changes evident in the alignment. The best models are expected to provide more accurate trees, and their properties can also shed light on the evolutionary processes that occur in RNA genes. Comparing DNA and RNA substitution models is non-trivial however, because they describe changes between two different types of state, so I present a proof that allows models with different state spaces to be compared in a statistically valid manner. I find that a large proportion of RNA genes are well described by a single RNA model that includes parameters describing both nucleotides and RNA structure, highlighting the multiple levels of constraint that act on the genes. The choice of model affects the inference of a phylogenetic tree, suggesting that model selection, with RNA models, should be standard practice for analysis of RNA genes.

    Bibliographic metadata

    Type of resource:
    Content type:
    Form of thesis:
    Type of submission:
    Degree type:
    Doctor of Philosophy
    Degree programme:
    PhD Bioinformatics
    Publication date:
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Total pages:
    171
    Abstract:
    The diversity and range of the biological functions of non-coding RNA molecules (ncRNA) have only recently been realised, and phylogenetic analysis of the RNA genes that define these molecules can provide important insights into the evolutionary pressures acting on RNA genes, and can lead to a better understanding of the structure and function of ncRNA. An appropriate dataset is fundamental to any evolutionary analysis, and because existing RNA alignments are unsuitable, I describe a software pipeline to derive RNA gene datasets from genomic alignments. RNA gene prediction software has not previously been evaluated on such sets of known RNA genes, and I find that two popular methods fail to predict the genes in approximately half of the alignments. In addition, high numbers of predictions are made in flanking regions that lack RNA genes, and these results provide motivation for subsequent phylogenetic analyses, because a better understanding of RNA gene evolution should lead to improved methods of prediction.I analyse the RNA gene alignments with a range of evolutionary models of substitution and examine which models best describe the changes evident in the alignment. The best models are expected to provide more accurate trees, and their properties can also shed light on the evolutionary processes that occur in RNA genes. Comparing DNA and RNA substitution models is non-trivial however, because they describe changes between two different types of state, so I present a proof that allows models with different state spaces to be compared in a statistically valid manner. I find that a large proportion of RNA genes are well described by a single RNA model that includes parameters describing both nucleotides and RNA structure, highlighting the multiple levels of constraint that act on the genes. The choice of model affects the inference of a phylogenetic tree, suggesting that model selection, with RNA models, should be standard practice for analysis of RNA genes.
    Thesis main supervisor(s):
    Thesis co-supervisor(s):
    Thesis advisor(s):
    Language:
    en

    Institutional metadata

    University researcher(s):
    Academic department(s):

    Record metadata

    Manchester eScholar ID:
    uk-ac-man-scw:215516
    Created by:
    Allen, James
    Created:
    16th December, 2013, 20:25:37
    Last modified by:
    Allen, James
    Last modified:
    30th April, 2014, 13:50:03

    Can we help?

    The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.