In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

University researcher(s)

    The Fusion Hypothesis: A Panacea for Mental Health Law? A critical investigation into the proposals for combined mental health and mental capacity legislation.

    Dance, Elizabeth

    [Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2014.

    Access to files

    Abstract

    The current mental health legislation continues to be criticised due to the lack of relevant decision-making criterion, such as the use of capacity assessments in regards to compulsory treatment of persons with mental illness and the continued discriminatory nature of the legal frameworks towards those with mental illness. This has lead to increased attention from the proposals of those wishing to reform the law. One such approach that has gained momentum is that of the fusion hypothesis. A fusionist approach to mental health law reform would signal the start of a major paradigm shift in the way in which patients with mental illnesses were to be treated. Fusionist suggestions offers to enhance patient autonomy and eradicate discrimination by introducing capacity-based thresholds into a single piece of legislation allowing both persons with mental illness and those with physical illness to be treated under the same legal framework. This approach would therefore combine mental health legislation with mental capacity legislation to create a unified decision-making legal regime. Fusion offers a patient with mental illness the opportunity to decide for themselves how to be treated using non-discriminatory mental health law and could be particularly attractive to patients, who are liable to be detained under the current mental health legislation, as this approach would seek to give them decision-making rights which they currently do not have. The fusion hypothesis is therefore in need of further investigation; focussing on its claims that it will indeed enhance autonomy and reduce discrimination. To do this capacity relevant legislation will be assessed and its links to autonomy will be discovered. It will be shown that the relationship between these two concepts are not as straightforward as fusionists purport. Following this it will be established that when fusionists talk of non-discrimination what they are really arguing for is ‘formal equality’ and it will be established that in certain circumstances it may be legitimate to continue with differential treatment of even those with capacity. The thesis will conclude with an examination of the impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities providing the fusion hypothesis with a caution as it moves forward.

    Bibliographic metadata

    Type of resource:
    Content type:
    Form of thesis:
    Type of submission:
    Degree type:
    Master of Philosophy
    Degree programme:
    MPhil Law
    Publication date:
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Total pages:
    137
    Abstract:
    The current mental health legislation continues to be criticised due to the lack of relevant decision-making criterion, such as the use of capacity assessments in regards to compulsory treatment of persons with mental illness and the continued discriminatory nature of the legal frameworks towards those with mental illness. This has lead to increased attention from the proposals of those wishing to reform the law. One such approach that has gained momentum is that of the fusion hypothesis. A fusionist approach to mental health law reform would signal the start of a major paradigm shift in the way in which patients with mental illnesses were to be treated. Fusionist suggestions offers to enhance patient autonomy and eradicate discrimination by introducing capacity-based thresholds into a single piece of legislation allowing both persons with mental illness and those with physical illness to be treated under the same legal framework. This approach would therefore combine mental health legislation with mental capacity legislation to create a unified decision-making legal regime. Fusion offers a patient with mental illness the opportunity to decide for themselves how to be treated using non-discriminatory mental health law and could be particularly attractive to patients, who are liable to be detained under the current mental health legislation, as this approach would seek to give them decision-making rights which they currently do not have. The fusion hypothesis is therefore in need of further investigation; focussing on its claims that it will indeed enhance autonomy and reduce discrimination. To do this capacity relevant legislation will be assessed and its links to autonomy will be discovered. It will be shown that the relationship between these two concepts are not as straightforward as fusionists purport. Following this it will be established that when fusionists talk of non-discrimination what they are really arguing for is ‘formal equality’ and it will be established that in certain circumstances it may be legitimate to continue with differential treatment of even those with capacity. The thesis will conclude with an examination of the impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities providing the fusion hypothesis with a caution as it moves forward.
    Thesis main supervisor(s):
    Thesis co-supervisor(s):
    Language:
    en

    Institutional metadata

    University researcher(s):
    Academic department(s):

    Record metadata

    Manchester eScholar ID:
    uk-ac-man-scw:219461
    Created by:
    Dance, Elizabeth
    Created:
    16th February, 2014, 13:28:53
    Last modified by:
    Dance, Elizabeth
    Last modified:
    9th January, 2019, 09:48:39

    Can we help?

    The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.