In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Wilding, Timothy S; McKay, Colette M; Baker, Richard J; Kluk, Karolina

Ear and hearing. 2012;33(2):267-78.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the between-session repeatability of auditory steady state response (ASSR) amplitudes and to examine F ratio response detection parameters. DESIGN: Suprathreshold ASSRs were recorded from 20 normal-hearing and 10 hearing-impaired subjects. Amplitudes and latencies were recorded in two test sessions conducted on separate days. ANALYSIS: The repeatability coefficients (limits of expected variation in repeat measurements) for amplitude and latency of ASSRs were calculated. The test time required for the responses to reach significance at 1%, 2%, and 5% F ratios was analyzed. The percentage false response detection rate was calculated to determine the suitability of current ASSR threshold estimation protocols for use in audiology clinics. RESULTS: The repeatability coefficients for the amplitude of ASSRs were 29 nV for the normal-hearing subjects and 57 nV for the hearing-impaired subjects. The repeatability coefficients for the latency of ASSR were 1.10 msec for the normal-hearing subjects and 1.19 msec for the hearing-impaired subjects. High false-positive detection rates were found for detection procedures that used variable test time ("stop when significance reached" methods). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that ASSR amplitudes are highly variable between test sessions with an average estimated variability in response amplitude of ± 40% for normal-hearing participants and ± 97% for hearing-impaired participants. This could be a possible cause of test-retest differences in ASSR threshold measurements, as it could potentially lead to thresholds that were above the EEG noise level and significant in one test session subsequently falling below the EEG noise level in the repeat test session leading to insignificant response and thus poorer ASSR threshold.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication status:
Accepted
Publication type:
Published date:
Language:
eng
Journal title:
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
United States
Volume:
33
Issue:
2
Pagination:
267-78
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1097/AUD.0b013e318230bba0
Pubmed Identifier:
21909024
Attached files embargo period:
Immediate release
Attached files release date:
19th June, 2014
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:227396
Created by:
Kluk-de Kort, Karolina
Created:
19th June, 2014, 12:05:53
Last modified by:
Kluk-de Kort, Karolina
Last modified:
19th June, 2014, 12:20:29

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.