In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

Full-text held externally

Search for item elsewhere

University researcher(s)

Stephen Fowler's research staff profile

Academic department(s)

Detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with upper airways symptoms: Symptoms, signs or salivary pepsin?

Spyridoulias, Alexander; Lillie, Siobhan; Vyas, Aashish; Fowler, Stephen J

Respiratory medicine. 2015;109(8):963-9.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) can induce laryngeal hyper-responsiveness, a unifying feature underlying chronic cough and vocal cord dysfunction. The diagnosis of LPR currently relies on invasive oesophageal pH impedance testing. We compared symptoms, laryngeal signs and salivary pepsin as potential diagnostic methods for identifying LPR in patients with upper airway symptoms. METHODS: Symptoms were assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and signs of laryngeal inflammation quantified using the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) during laryngoscopy. Saliva samples were analysed for the presence of pepsin. A sub-group of patients with severe symptoms and signs of LPR were investigated with oesophageal pH monitoring and impedance study. RESULTS: Seventy eight patients with chronic cough and/or suspected vocal cord dysfunction were recruited, mean (SD) age, 54.6 (15.6) years. The majority (87%) had significant symptoms of reflux (RSI>13). There were clinical signs of LPR (RFS>7) in 51% of cases. Pepsin was detected in the saliva of 63% of subjects and 78% of those with a high RFS. Salivary pepsin had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 53% for predicting a high RFS. There was a correlation between the RSI and RFS (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and between the severity of laryngeal inflammation and the concentration of pepsin (r = 0.28, p = 0.01). All cases investigated with pH-impedance study had objective evidence of proximal reflux. CONCLUSION: Salivary pepsin may be used as a screening adjunct to supplement the RFS in the clinical workup of patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms and upper respiratory tract presentations of reflux.

Keyword(s)

Chronic cough; Laryngopharyngeal reflux; Pepsin; Vocal cord dysfunction

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:

text

Content type:

Journal article

Publication type:

Review article