In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

University researcher(s)

    Drugs and Human Rights: A constitutional approach

    Ingram, Kenneth John

    [Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2019.

    Access to files

    Abstract

    This thesis examines whether it is an abuse of human rights to prohibit and criminalise a medically useful controlled drug. Specifically therefore, it examines whether the regime of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 is compatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. As Article 8 is a qualified human right, it can be justified if infringement of it is a proportional interference in pursuit of a legitimate aim. This thesis argues, using medical cannabis as a case study, that such a justification cannot be mounted and the medical prohibition of a medically useful drug is, therefore, an abuse of human rights.

    Bibliographic metadata

    Type of resource:
    Content type:
    Form of thesis:
    Type of submission:
    Degree type:
    Doctor of Philosophy
    Degree programme:
    PhD Law
    Publication date:
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Total pages:
    235
    Abstract:
    This thesis examines whether it is an abuse of human rights to prohibit and criminalise a medically useful controlled drug. Specifically therefore, it examines whether the regime of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 is compatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. As Article 8 is a qualified human right, it can be justified if infringement of it is a proportional interference in pursuit of a legitimate aim. This thesis argues, using medical cannabis as a case study, that such a justification cannot be mounted and the medical prohibition of a medically useful drug is, therefore, an abuse of human rights.
    Thesis main supervisor(s):
    Thesis co-supervisor(s):
    Language:
    en

    Institutional metadata

    University researcher(s):
    Academic department(s):

    Record metadata

    Manchester eScholar ID:
    uk-ac-man-scw:318249
    Created by:
    Ingram, Kenneth
    Created:
    3rd February, 2019, 15:31:52
    Last modified by:
    Ingram, Kenneth
    Last modified:
    8th February, 2019, 13:28:07

    Can we help?

    The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.