In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Knowledge and knowing revisited: A diffractive analysis of service delivery in an IT consultancy

Kwiatkowski, Wojciech

[Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2020.

Access to files

Abstract

Despite their shared origin in the critique of the conceptualisation of organisational knowledge expressed in strategic management literature, common socio-constructionist ontological assumptions and initial enthusiasm towards inter-disciplinary dialogue, interaction between possession- and practice-based approaches to the study of organisational knowledge has been relatively limited and often alienating. This thesis attempts to reverse this historical tendency and reinvigorate discourse between them. It achieves this objective through a diffractive analysis of service delivery at an IT consultancy. Diffractive analysis is an abductive approach to qualitative data analysis. It entails interpreting the same empirical material, which in the current study comprises interviews, documents and non-participant observations, using a selection of theoretical lenses. The lenses used in the current research are based on three theoretical perspectives derived from the extant literature. Drawing on their core concepts, I label them ‘knowledge-creation theory’ (KCT), ‘communities of practice’ (CoP) and ‘landscape of practices’ (LoP), respectively. KCT is associated with possession-based theorising, whereas the CoP and LoP perspectives are exemplars of practice-based theorising. Each of the theoretical interpretations resulting from the analysis elucidates a different understanding of service delivery at the case study organisation, whilst also extending the theory from which it has been derived. The complementarity of the three interpretations, whereby they enable understanding service delivery in greater depth and, in doing so, help overcome each other’s limitations, demonstrates that intellectually-stimulating dialogue between possession- and practice-based theorising is not only possible, but also desirable.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Form of thesis:
Type of submission:
Degree type:
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree programme:
PhD Business and Management
Publication date:
Location:
Manchester, UK
Total pages:
280
Abstract:
Despite their shared origin in the critique of the conceptualisation of organisational knowledge expressed in strategic management literature, common socio-constructionist ontological assumptions and initial enthusiasm towards inter-disciplinary dialogue, interaction between possession- and practice-based approaches to the study of organisational knowledge has been relatively limited and often alienating. This thesis attempts to reverse this historical tendency and reinvigorate discourse between them. It achieves this objective through a diffractive analysis of service delivery at an IT consultancy. Diffractive analysis is an abductive approach to qualitative data analysis. It entails interpreting the same empirical material, which in the current study comprises interviews, documents and non-participant observations, using a selection of theoretical lenses. The lenses used in the current research are based on three theoretical perspectives derived from the extant literature. Drawing on their core concepts, I label them ‘knowledge-creation theory’ (KCT), ‘communities of practice’ (CoP) and ‘landscape of practices’ (LoP), respectively. KCT is associated with possession-based theorising, whereas the CoP and LoP perspectives are exemplars of practice-based theorising. Each of the theoretical interpretations resulting from the analysis elucidates a different understanding of service delivery at the case study organisation, whilst also extending the theory from which it has been derived. The complementarity of the three interpretations, whereby they enable understanding service delivery in greater depth and, in doing so, help overcome each other’s limitations, demonstrates that intellectually-stimulating dialogue between possession- and practice-based theorising is not only possible, but also desirable.
Thesis main supervisor(s):
Thesis co-supervisor(s):
Language:
en

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:325233
Created by:
Kwiatkowski, Wojciech
Created:
30th June, 2020, 12:28:09
Last modified by:
Kwiatkowski, Wojciech
Last modified:
4th August, 2020, 10:36:38

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.