In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Computer simulation of dinosaur tracks

Falkingham, Peter Lewis

[Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2010.

Access to files

Abstract

Fossil tracks represent the only direct record of behaviour and locomotion of extinct animals. A computer model using finite element analysis (FEA) has been developed to simulate vertebrate track formation in cohesive substrates. This model has been designed for, and successfully run on, high performance computing (HPC) resources. A number of individual studies were carried out using the computer model to simulate both abstract indenters and virtual dinosaur autopodia. In addition to the simulation studies, two fossil tracks were described, including the first report of bird tracks at the Mammoth Site of Hot Springs, South Dakota (USA) and a re-description of a ‘dinosaur tail drag’ as the trace of a crocodilian. Using the computer model, it has been shown that in a wet, soft mud the indentation of a non-webbed virtual tridactyl foot created a resultant track with features analogous to ‘webbing’ between digits. This ‘webbing’ was a function of sediment deformation and subsequent failure in 3D, specific to rheology. Apparent webbing impressions were clearly developed only within a limited range of sediment conditions and pedal geometry. Indenter (pedal) geometry and morphology affect track depth independently of substrate and loading parameters. More complex morphologies interact with the cohesive substrate creating a lower effective load than that applied. In non-cohesive substrates such as sand, this effect is reversed, and it is the more compact morphologies that indent to a lesser degree. Virtual sauropod tracks were modelled, based on published soft tissue reconstructions of autopodia anatomy, and published mass/centre of mass estimates. It was shown that foot morphology and differential loading between fore- and hind- limbs leads to a range of substrates in which only the manus or pes are able to generate tracks. This offers a new mechanism for the formation of manus-only sauropod trackways, previously interpreted as having been made by swimming dinosaurs. A series of tracks were simulated using input data (loads, pedal morphologies) from four different dinosaurs (Brachiosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Struthiomimus, and Edmontosaurus). The cohesive substrates used displayed a ‘Goldilocks’ effect, allowing the formation for tracks only for a very limited range of loads for any given foot. In addition, there was a strong bias toward larger animals, both in homogeneous and theoretically heterogeneous substrates. These findings imply that interpretations from track assemblages must consider that only a small proportion of the total fauna present may be recorded as a track assemblage due to substrate properties. The use of FEA to simulate dinosaur track formation has been shown to be successful, and offers a number of advantages over physical modelling including; consistency between experiments, specific control over input variables, rapid undertaking of repeatable experiments, and the ability to view subsurface deformation non-destructively. It is hoped that this work will lead to an increased interest in modelling tracks, and offer a quantitative method for studying fossil tracks.

Layman's Abstract

Fossil tracks are important sources of information about aspects such as behaviour that would otherwise be unavailable from the body fossil record. A track is formed by the interaction of an animal’s foot and the sediment upon which it walks. A computer program has been developed to simulate the formation of tracks in mud-like sediments, so that fossil tracks may be ‘reverse engineered’ in order to better understand these extinct animals. This program was used in a number of individual studies. In addition to the computer simulation work, two fossil tracks were described.The first of the computer simulation studies showed that in certain conditions (wet, soft mud), a non-webbed foot could produce what appeared to be webbed tracks. Such an artefact of track formation has large implications for interpreting ‘webbed’ tracks in the fossil record. Indenting a series of different shapes into a mud produced tracks of different depth. More complex shapes were shown to indent to a greater degree than compact shapes (e.g. a square) in muds, whilst the reverse was shown to be the case in sand. Attempting to use fossil tracks to interpret the conditions of the sediment at the time of track formation must therefore take account of track shape as well as track size. Simulating tracks made by sauropod dinosaurs, using published reconstructions of mass and foot anatomy, showed that the distribution of weight along with the size and shape of the feet meant that different pressures were created under the front or hind feet. This lead to a range of sediment types in which only front or hind feet could leave tracks, providing a mechanism for so called ‘manus-only’ trackways of sauropods (in which only tracks made by the front feet are recorded) far simpler than current theories involving swimming or ‘punting’ dinosaurs. Finally, a number of dinosaurs were simulated, ranging from 400 to 25,000 kg. Results showed a strong bias towards larger animals, indicating that interpretations based on track assemblages may not be representative of the full range of animals living in the area when the tracks were made. By using computer simulation, rather than physically modelling the tracks, a range of conditions became possible (e.g. simulating tracks made by a 25,000 kg animal). The computer model allowed for rapid completion of repeatable experiments, and the digital data could be cut and viewed from any angle to see beneath the surface, whilst retaining the original sample. This work opens up multiple possibilities for the study of fossil tracks in the future.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Form of thesis:
Type of submission:
Degree type:
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree programme:
PhD Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
Publication date:
Location:
Manchester, UK
Total pages:
304
Abstract:
Fossil tracks represent the only direct record of behaviour and locomotion of extinct animals. A computer model using finite element analysis (FEA) has been developed to simulate vertebrate track formation in cohesive substrates. This model has been designed for, and successfully run on, high performance computing (HPC) resources. A number of individual studies were carried out using the computer model to simulate both abstract indenters and virtual dinosaur autopodia. In addition to the simulation studies, two fossil tracks were described, including the first report of bird tracks at the Mammoth Site of Hot Springs, South Dakota (USA) and a re-description of a ‘dinosaur tail drag’ as the trace of a crocodilian. Using the computer model, it has been shown that in a wet, soft mud the indentation of a non-webbed virtual tridactyl foot created a resultant track with features analogous to ‘webbing’ between digits. This ‘webbing’ was a function of sediment deformation and subsequent failure in 3D, specific to rheology. Apparent webbing impressions were clearly developed only within a limited range of sediment conditions and pedal geometry. Indenter (pedal) geometry and morphology affect track depth independently of substrate and loading parameters. More complex morphologies interact with the cohesive substrate creating a lower effective load than that applied. In non-cohesive substrates such as sand, this effect is reversed, and it is the more compact morphologies that indent to a lesser degree. Virtual sauropod tracks were modelled, based on published soft tissue reconstructions of autopodia anatomy, and published mass/centre of mass estimates. It was shown that foot morphology and differential loading between fore- and hind- limbs leads to a range of substrates in which only the manus or pes are able to generate tracks. This offers a new mechanism for the formation of manus-only sauropod trackways, previously interpreted as having been made by swimming dinosaurs. A series of tracks were simulated using input data (loads, pedal morphologies) from four different dinosaurs (Brachiosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Struthiomimus, and Edmontosaurus). The cohesive substrates used displayed a ‘Goldilocks’ effect, allowing the formation for tracks only for a very limited range of loads for any given foot. In addition, there was a strong bias toward larger animals, both in homogeneous and theoretically heterogeneous substrates. These findings imply that interpretations from track assemblages must consider that only a small proportion of the total fauna present may be recorded as a track assemblage due to substrate properties. The use of FEA to simulate dinosaur track formation has been shown to be successful, and offers a number of advantages over physical modelling including; consistency between experiments, specific control over input variables, rapid undertaking of repeatable experiments, and the ability to view subsurface deformation non-destructively. It is hoped that this work will lead to an increased interest in modelling tracks, and offer a quantitative method for studying fossil tracks.
Layman's abstract:
Fossil tracks are important sources of information about aspects such as behaviour that would otherwise be unavailable from the body fossil record. A track is formed by the interaction of an animal’s foot and the sediment upon which it walks. A computer program has been developed to simulate the formation of tracks in mud-like sediments, so that fossil tracks may be ‘reverse engineered’ in order to better understand these extinct animals. This program was used in a number of individual studies. In addition to the computer simulation work, two fossil tracks were described.The first of the computer simulation studies showed that in certain conditions (wet, soft mud), a non-webbed foot could produce what appeared to be webbed tracks. Such an artefact of track formation has large implications for interpreting ‘webbed’ tracks in the fossil record. Indenting a series of different shapes into a mud produced tracks of different depth. More complex shapes were shown to indent to a greater degree than compact shapes (e.g. a square) in muds, whilst the reverse was shown to be the case in sand. Attempting to use fossil tracks to interpret the conditions of the sediment at the time of track formation must therefore take account of track shape as well as track size. Simulating tracks made by sauropod dinosaurs, using published reconstructions of mass and foot anatomy, showed that the distribution of weight along with the size and shape of the feet meant that different pressures were created under the front or hind feet. This lead to a range of sediment types in which only front or hind feet could leave tracks, providing a mechanism for so called ‘manus-only’ trackways of sauropods (in which only tracks made by the front feet are recorded) far simpler than current theories involving swimming or ‘punting’ dinosaurs. Finally, a number of dinosaurs were simulated, ranging from 400 to 25,000 kg. Results showed a strong bias towards larger animals, indicating that interpretations based on track assemblages may not be representative of the full range of animals living in the area when the tracks were made. By using computer simulation, rather than physically modelling the tracks, a range of conditions became possible (e.g. simulating tracks made by a 25,000 kg animal). The computer model allowed for rapid completion of repeatable experiments, and the digital data could be cut and viewed from any angle to see beneath the surface, whilst retaining the original sample. This work opens up multiple possibilities for the study of fossil tracks in the future.
Thesis main supervisor(s):
Thesis co-supervisor(s):
Thesis advisor(s):
Funder(s):
Language:
en

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:90545
Created by:
Falkingham, Peter
Created:
20th September, 2010, 08:48:58
Last modified by:
Falkingham, Peter
Last modified:
22nd December, 2011, 19:30:52

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.