In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Multiproject-multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

García-Gómez, Juan M; Luts, Jan; Julià-Sapé, Margarida; Krooshof, Patrick; Tortajada, Salvador; Robledo, Javier Vicente; Melssen, Willem; Fuster-García, Elies; Olier, Iván; Postma, Geert; Monleón, Daniel; Moreno-Torres, Angel; Pujol, Jesús; Candiota, Ana-Paula; Martínez-Bisbal, M Carmen; Suykens, Johan; Buydens, Lutgarde; Celda, Bernardo; Van Huffel, Sabine; Arús, Carles; Robles, Montserrat

Magma (New York, N.Y.). 2009;22(1):5-18.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

UNLABELLED: JUSTIFICATION: Automatic brain tumor classification by MRS has been under development for more than a decade. Nonetheless, to our knowledge, there are no published evaluations of predictive models with unseen cases that are subsequently acquired in different centers. The multicenter eTUMOUR project (2004-2009), which builds upon previous expertise from the INTERPRET project (2000-2002) has allowed such an evaluation to take place. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 253 pairwise classifiers for glioblastoma, meningioma, metastasis, and low-grade glial diagnosis were inferred based on 211 SV short TE INTERPRET MR spectra obtained at 1.5 T (PRESS or STEAM, 20-32 ms) and automatically pre-processed. Afterwards, the classifiers were tested with 97 spectra, which were subsequently compiled during eTUMOUR. RESULTS: In our results based on subsequently acquired spectra, accuracies of around 90% were achieved for most of the pairwise discrimination problems. The exception was for the glioblastoma versus metastasis discrimination, which was below 78%. A more clear definition of metastases may be obtained by other approaches, such as MRSI + MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction of the tumor type of in-vivo MRS is possible using classifiers developed from previously acquired data, in different hospitals with different instrumentation under the same acquisition protocols. This methodology may find application for assisting in the diagnosis of new brain tumor cases and for the quality control of multicenter MRS databases.

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:118539
Created by:
Olier, Ivan
Created:
9th February, 2011, 16:54:44
Last modified by:
Olier, Ivan
Last modified:
20th November, 2015, 20:20:51

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.