In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

The relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and maximum power output in subjects recently fitted with NHS hearing aids.

Munro, K J; Nind, L; Cleaver, V C

British journal of audiology. 1996;30(4):275-85.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

It is generally agreed that the maximum output from a hearing aid should not exceed the subject's uncomfortable loudness level (ULL). However, this relationship is not easily defined as electroacoustic data are usually measured in a 2 cc coupler and auditory measurements are usually obtained from supra-aural transducers calibrated in a 6 cc coupler. The aim of the study was to investigate this relationship in 21 adults who were being fitted with a hearing aid for the first time. A probe-tube microphone system was used to measure the sound pressure level of both variables in the ear canal. The measurement of ULL was determined using the method recommended by the British Society of Audiology (1987). The ULL values were around 110 dB SPL (+/-10) when measured in the ear canal. The maximum output of the hearing aid was obtained by correcting the SSPL90 with the subject's own real ear to coupler difference. The results revealed that the real ear saturation response (RESR) of the newly fitted hearing aid was typically 115-120 dB SPL (+/-8). The RESR exceeded the ULL for 19 (90%) subjects on average at five of the seven frequencies and by 12 dB. While further research is needed to determine whether discomfort occurred in real life situations, the implications are that the subject may use the hearing aid at less than optimum settings to prevent loudness discomfort or may ultimately reject the hearing aid altogether.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Published date:
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
ENGLAND
Volume:
30
Issue:
4
Pagination:
275-85
Pubmed Identifier:
8879692
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:146793
Created by:
Munro, Kevin
Created:
10th January, 2012, 12:15:59
Last modified by:
Munro, Kevin
Last modified:
10th January, 2012, 12:15:59

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.