In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Aligning human resource development with organisational strategy in construction: What else matters?

Paul W Chan and Mick Marchington

In: A. Dainty and M. Loosemore, editor(s). Human Resource Management in Construction: Critical Perspectives. 2 ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012. p. 80-110.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Publications analysing the development and improvement of human capabilities in organisations, or human resource development (HRD), have often made connections with organisational performance and strategy. The purpose of this chapter is to question this prescriptive link by highlighting disconnections between rhetorical benefits and practised reality of HRD. The discussion centres on three key challenges that cast doubt on dominant view that aligning HRD practices to meet the strategic objectives of the firm is desirable and achievable in the construction industry. Firstly, there is the danger that organisational strategy is narrowly determined by senior managers. The myopic view that HRD should align with strategy specified by the corporate elite marginalises genuine participation of workers, and distorts the true picture of how HRD benefits all stakeholders within the organisation. Secondly, companies in construction are rarely in charge of their own destinies, given the networked organisational context that characterises work in the sector. Therefore, it is difficult to define employer responsibility of HRD given the inter-organisational dynamics that matter in construction. Thirdly, there is the challenge of looking beyond the organisation to consider wider political economy of skills formation in construction. It is crucial that employers engage with the vocational education and training (VET) system. The conclusions point to the need for researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to clarify levels of analysis across interpersonal, inter-organisational and institutional perspectives when examining HRD in construction.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Type of book contribution:
Book contribution subtitle:
Book subtitle:
Publication date:
Place of publication:
Abingdon
Publisher:
Book edition:
2
Contribution start page:
80
Contribution end page:
110
Contribution editor(s) list:
Abstract:
Publications analysing the development and improvement of human capabilities in organisations, or human resource development (HRD), have often made connections with organisational performance and strategy. The purpose of this chapter is to question this prescriptive link by highlighting disconnections between rhetorical benefits and practised reality of HRD. The discussion centres on three key challenges that cast doubt on dominant view that aligning HRD practices to meet the strategic objectives of the firm is desirable and achievable in the construction industry. Firstly, there is the danger that organisational strategy is narrowly determined by senior managers. The myopic view that HRD should align with strategy specified by the corporate elite marginalises genuine participation of workers, and distorts the true picture of how HRD benefits all stakeholders within the organisation. Secondly, companies in construction are rarely in charge of their own destinies, given the networked organisational context that characterises work in the sector. Therefore, it is difficult to define employer responsibility of HRD given the inter-organisational dynamics that matter in construction. Thirdly, there is the challenge of looking beyond the organisation to consider wider political economy of skills formation in construction. It is crucial that employers engage with the vocational education and training (VET) system. The conclusions point to the need for researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to clarify levels of analysis across interpersonal, inter-organisational and institutional perspectives when examining HRD in construction.
Language:
eng
Related website(s):
  • Related website http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415593076/

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:170228
Created by:
Chan, Paul
Created:
18th September, 2012, 13:30:13
Last modified by:
Chan, Paul
Last modified:
28th January, 2015, 09:19:04

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.