Related resources
Full-text held externally
Search for item elsewhere
University researcher(s)
Academic department(s)
Social knowledge
Jensen, Keith; Silk, Joan B; Andrews, Kristin; Bshary, Redouan; Cheney, Dorothy L; Emery, Nathan; Hemelrijk, Charlotte K; Holekamp, Kay; Penn, Derek C; Perner, Josef; Teufel, Christoph
In: Animal Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011. p. 267-291.
Access to files
Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:
Full-text held externally
Abstract
The social milieus of animals can be complex, ranging from almost completely asocial to monogamous pairs (no mean feat) to entire societies. To adapt to a constantly shift- ing environment of individuals striving toward their own goals, animals appear to have evolved specialized cognitive abilities. As appealing and intuitive as the idea of social cognition is, just defining it is difficult. We attempted to delineate social cognition, speculate on its adaptive value, and come to an understanding of what we mean when we talk about complexity. Transitive inference was often brought up as an example of a cognitive ability that is important for social animals, though the focus of much of the discussion was on theory of mind. For some, theory of mind is something of a Holy Grail, whereas for others, it is more of a McGuffin. There are a number of challenges and debates in trying to determine what cognitive abilities different animals use to solve their social problems. This chapter discusses methodological approaches and issues that are needed to propel the future of research into social knowledge.
Bibliographic metadata
- Related website http://www.esforum.de
- Related website http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=12681
- StrĂĽngmann Forum on Animal Thinking, September 2010 can post this version, but must include the links