In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

A comparison of the long-term effectiveness of distraction and focusing in the treatment of auditory hallucinations.

Haddock G, Slade P, Bentall RP, Reid D, Faragher E

Br J Med Psychol. 1998;71 ( Pt 3):339-49.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Use our list of Related resources to find this item elsewhere. Alternatively, request a copy from the Library's Document supply service.

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioural interventions for patients experiencing neuroleptic resistant auditory hallucinations have fallen into two main categories: those which encourage distraction as a coping strategy, and those which encourage patients to focus on or expose themselves to their hallucinations. A 20-session distraction treatment was compared with an equal length focusing treatment for 19 patients who were experiencing chronic auditory hallucinations. Patients were followed-up for approximately 2 years. No differences were observed between the groups for outcome on symptom severity overall, although the focusers showed a greater belief that their voices were their own thoughts at the final follow-up point. When the two groups were combined, there was a significant reduction in the frequency of hallucinations and the disruption to life caused by them during treatment, although this was not maintained at follow-up. During treatment, there was a significant increase in self-esteem for focusers but a significant decrease for distracters. At 2-year follow-up, both focusers and distracters showed a reduction in self-esteem in comparison to the end of therapy. The results show no overwhelming advantage of one treatment over the other and confirm previous observations of the difficulty of treating hallucinations with cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT). However, there was some indication that CBT influenced some important clinical variables and further investigation is warranted.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
ENGLAND
Volume:
71 ( Pt 3)
Start page:
339
End page:
49
Pagination:
339-49
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:1d10072
Created:
29th August, 2009, 15:28:58
Last modified:
29th August, 2009, 15:28:58

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.