In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

Full-text held externally

University researcher(s)

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry calibration transfer and metabolomics data fusion.

Vaughan, Andrew A; Dunn, Warwick B; Allwood, J William; Wedge, David C; Blackhall, Fiona H; Whetton, Anthony D; Dive, Caroline; Goodacre, Royston

Analytical chemistry. 2012;84(22):9848-57.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Metabolic profiling is routinely performed on multiple analytical platforms to increase the coverage of detected metabolites, and it is often necessary to distribute biological and clinical samples from a study between instruments of the same type to share the workload between different laboratories. The ability to combine metabolomics data arising from different sources is therefore of great interest, particularly for large-scale or long-term studies, where samples must be analyzed in separate blocks. This is not a trivial task, however, due to differing data structures, temporal variability, and instrumental drift. In this study, we employed blood serum and plasma samples collected from 29 subjects diagnosed with small cell lung cancer and analyzed each sample on two liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) platforms. We describe a method for mapping retention times and matching metabolite features between platforms and approaches for fusing data acquired from both instruments. Calibration transfer models were developed and shown to be successful at mapping the response of one LC-MS instrument to another (Procrustes dissimilarity = 0.04; Mantel correlation = 0.95), allowing us to merge the data from different samples analyzed on different instruments. Data fusion was assessed in a clinical context by comparing the correlation of each metabolite with subject survival time in both the original and fused data sets: a simple autoscaling procedure (Pearson's R = 0.99) was found to improve upon a calibration transfer method based on partial least-squares regression (R = 0.94).

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Publication type:
Published date:
Journal title:
Abbreviated journal title:
ISSN:
Place of publication:
United States
Volume:
84
Issue:
22
Pagination:
9848-57
Digital Object Identifier:
10.1021/ac302227c
Pubmed Identifier:
23072438
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):
Academic department(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:219343
Created by:
Whetton, Anthony
Created:
14th February, 2014, 14:01:17
Last modified by:
Whetton, Anthony
Last modified:
1st February, 2015, 19:13:10

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.