In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

TOWARDS SYSTEMATIC REQUIREMENTS REUSE

Naish, James Alexander

[Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2014.

Access to files

Abstract

Reuse has often been claimed in the software engineering literature to improve thequality and reduce the cost of software. Motivated by the idea that these gains canbe multiplied if reuse can be achieved earlier in the software life-cycle, a subset ofthe requirements engineering literature has focused, since the inception of the field,on investigating approaches to reuse at the requirements level. A wide array of differentapproaches now exist within this space. However, these approaches offer varyingdegrees of generality and utility. Generality is important because it enables a requirementsengineer to utilise the same reuse library across multiple projects. Utility isimportant because it is a measure of the extent to which effort is reduced by utilising areuse approach.This thesis presents Reuse-Oriented Requirements Engineering (RORE): a systematicframework to support the production of requirements models by reuse. RORE aimsto improve on existing requirements-reuse approaches in respect of the generalityutilitytrade-off. RORE seeks to do this by bringing together the strengths of two existingrequirements-level reuse approaches: The Domain Theory and Problem-OrientedSoftware Engineering (POSE - a refinement of Jackson’s Problem Frames Approach).This thesis evaluates RORE with respect to both generality and utility, and comparesRORE against both frameworks. The major conclusion of the thesis is that while ROREimproves on each framework in respect of some, but not all, evaluation metrics, ROREdoes succeed in offering a level of generality which compares favourably to existinghighly general approaches, and without significantly reducing the utility of the approach.

Layman's Abstract

This thesis provides a critique of reuse-driven approaches to the capture and analysis of software requirements, leading to a novel approach to requirements engineering in which models are transformed through a chain of different model types by means of the reuse of requirements patterns.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Form of thesis:
Type of submission:
Degree type:
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree programme:
PhD Computer Science
Publication date:
Location:
Manchester, UK
Total pages:
508
Abstract:
Reuse has often been claimed in the software engineering literature to improve thequality and reduce the cost of software. Motivated by the idea that these gains canbe multiplied if reuse can be achieved earlier in the software life-cycle, a subset ofthe requirements engineering literature has focused, since the inception of the field,on investigating approaches to reuse at the requirements level. A wide array of differentapproaches now exist within this space. However, these approaches offer varyingdegrees of generality and utility. Generality is important because it enables a requirementsengineer to utilise the same reuse library across multiple projects. Utility isimportant because it is a measure of the extent to which effort is reduced by utilising areuse approach.This thesis presents Reuse-Oriented Requirements Engineering (RORE): a systematicframework to support the production of requirements models by reuse. RORE aimsto improve on existing requirements-reuse approaches in respect of the generalityutilitytrade-off. RORE seeks to do this by bringing together the strengths of two existingrequirements-level reuse approaches: The Domain Theory and Problem-OrientedSoftware Engineering (POSE - a refinement of Jackson’s Problem Frames Approach).This thesis evaluates RORE with respect to both generality and utility, and comparesRORE against both frameworks. The major conclusion of the thesis is that while ROREimproves on each framework in respect of some, but not all, evaluation metrics, ROREdoes succeed in offering a level of generality which compares favourably to existinghighly general approaches, and without significantly reducing the utility of the approach.
Layman's abstract:
This thesis provides a critique of reuse-driven approaches to the capture and analysis of software requirements, leading to a novel approach to requirements engineering in which models are transformed through a chain of different model types by means of the reuse of requirements patterns.
Thesis advisor(s):
Language:
en

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:225706
Created by:
Naish, James
Created:
23rd May, 2014, 08:26:15
Last modified by:
Naish, James
Last modified:
1st August, 2014, 10:00:40

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.