In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

An investigation of the proof-of-concept for a perceptual control approach to inform robotic rehabilitation

Parker, Maximilian Gregory

[Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2019.

Access to files

Abstract

Neurological damage often results in motor impairments and reductions in individuals’ functional abilities, particularly when the upper limbs are affected. Many individuals fail to achieve potential recovery of hand function due to insufficient volume of arm-hand training. Robotic rehabilitation has been proposed as an adjunct to physical therapy to meet this shortfall. However, it may be the case that functional recovery is also limited by practice. It has been observed that advances in motor control theory, mostly arising from computational modelling of behavioural data, have not been integrated in rehabilitation practice. The relatively new field of rehabilitation robotics presents a perfect application and testbed for principles of motor theory. Moreover, one specific motor theory, perceptual control theory (Powers, 1973, 2008), has been identified as architecture for designing robotic control architectures (Young, 2018). In this thesis, we commence a research agenda that aims to test the proof-of-principle of PCT to inform robotic motor rehabilitation. The thesis consists of five original research reports. Two systematic reviews were conducted. The first aims to establish whether end-effector devices for arm and hand rehabilitation are efficacious in reducing impairment and improving functional outcomes. Findings suggested that device training may be efficacious for acute, subacute and chronic stroke patients. Thus it was determined that a research agenda which aimed to inform device development through motor theory was justified. A second systematic review evaluated the research literature regarding PCT models of manual tracking performance, in order to determine the extent to which PCT can account for motor performance in the task. Several key limitations in the PCT modelling literature were found. These limitations were investigated in a series of tracking experiments in which PCT models were optimised to, and simulated individual performance. In the first experiment, we developed a test for model individual-specificity. This was applied to PCT models and it was found that optimised PCT models simulated performance at validation (one-week later) with a higher degree of accuracy than a general PCT model. This demonstrates that the PCT model can discriminate between individual control characteristics. In the second experiment, we aimed to establish the effect of delay on model performance as it was not clear whether PCT models could compensate for long feedback delays that are present in the central nervous system. Four PCT model architectures were compared. The standard PCT position control model showed a reduction in model fit to anticipatory tracking behaviour at increasing delays. Conversely, models that controlled a novel perceptual variable (integrated motion representations) showed no such cost to performance at longer delays. Thus, given the appropriate controlled perceptual variable, PCT models can compensate for sensorimotor delays in motor performance. In the final experiment we aimed to investigate the generalisability of the model to a different task conditions. We evaluated whether the most superior model from the previous experiment could make individual-specific predictions (as per the first experiment), when individuals tracked sinusoidal and pseudorandom targets at different speeds with a new apparatus (steering wheel). The model was found to generalise well across task constraints. In sum, the thesis develops a control model that can characterise and simulate individual performance over a range of task constraints. In the process, we addressed several important limitations in the evidence base for PCT. The implications of these advancements for the fields of motor control, and rehabilitation, are discussed in the concluding chapter. The aim of future work will be to implement the novel PCT architecture within the control algorithm for a robotic device for motor rehabilitation.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Form of thesis:
Type of submission:
Degree type:
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree programme:
PhD Psychology 4yr PMH
Publication date:
Location:
Manchester, UK
Total pages:
376
Abstract:
Neurological damage often results in motor impairments and reductions in individuals’ functional abilities, particularly when the upper limbs are affected. Many individuals fail to achieve potential recovery of hand function due to insufficient volume of arm-hand training. Robotic rehabilitation has been proposed as an adjunct to physical therapy to meet this shortfall. However, it may be the case that functional recovery is also limited by practice. It has been observed that advances in motor control theory, mostly arising from computational modelling of behavioural data, have not been integrated in rehabilitation practice. The relatively new field of rehabilitation robotics presents a perfect application and testbed for principles of motor theory. Moreover, one specific motor theory, perceptual control theory (Powers, 1973, 2008), has been identified as architecture for designing robotic control architectures (Young, 2018). In this thesis, we commence a research agenda that aims to test the proof-of-principle of PCT to inform robotic motor rehabilitation. The thesis consists of five original research reports. Two systematic reviews were conducted. The first aims to establish whether end-effector devices for arm and hand rehabilitation are efficacious in reducing impairment and improving functional outcomes. Findings suggested that device training may be efficacious for acute, subacute and chronic stroke patients. Thus it was determined that a research agenda which aimed to inform device development through motor theory was justified. A second systematic review evaluated the research literature regarding PCT models of manual tracking performance, in order to determine the extent to which PCT can account for motor performance in the task. Several key limitations in the PCT modelling literature were found. These limitations were investigated in a series of tracking experiments in which PCT models were optimised to, and simulated individual performance. In the first experiment, we developed a test for model individual-specificity. This was applied to PCT models and it was found that optimised PCT models simulated performance at validation (one-week later) with a higher degree of accuracy than a general PCT model. This demonstrates that the PCT model can discriminate between individual control characteristics. In the second experiment, we aimed to establish the effect of delay on model performance as it was not clear whether PCT models could compensate for long feedback delays that are present in the central nervous system. Four PCT model architectures were compared. The standard PCT position control model showed a reduction in model fit to anticipatory tracking behaviour at increasing delays. Conversely, models that controlled a novel perceptual variable (integrated motion representations) showed no such cost to performance at longer delays. Thus, given the appropriate controlled perceptual variable, PCT models can compensate for sensorimotor delays in motor performance. In the final experiment we aimed to investigate the generalisability of the model to a different task conditions. We evaluated whether the most superior model from the previous experiment could make individual-specific predictions (as per the first experiment), when individuals tracked sinusoidal and pseudorandom targets at different speeds with a new apparatus (steering wheel). The model was found to generalise well across task constraints. In sum, the thesis develops a control model that can characterise and simulate individual performance over a range of task constraints. In the process, we addressed several important limitations in the evidence base for PCT. The implications of these advancements for the fields of motor control, and rehabilitation, are discussed in the concluding chapter. The aim of future work will be to implement the novel PCT architecture within the control algorithm for a robotic device for motor rehabilitation.
Thesis main supervisor(s):
Thesis co-supervisor(s):
Language:
en

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:318892
Created by:
Parker, Maximilian
Created:
25th March, 2019, 13:32:25
Last modified by:
Parker, Maximilian
Last modified:
8th April, 2020, 09:29:44

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.