In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

EFFECT OF SURFACE FINISH ON FATIGUE OFAUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS

Al-Shahrani, Saeed

[Thesis]. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester; 2010.

Access to files

Abstract

The effect of surface finish on fatigue limit of two types of austenitic stainless steels(AISI 304L and AISI 316L) has been investigated. Fatigue specimens having twodifferent surface conditions were obtained by changing the final cutting condition;annealing was performed to separate the residual stress effects from surface roughness.Electropolished samples were tested as a reference for each material.A generic mechanistic model for short fatigue crack propagation proposed by Navarroand Rios (N-R model) was implemented to assess its suitability for predicting thefatigue behaviour of specimens with various controlled surface conditions, obtained bymachining. The surface/material properties required to implement this model wereobtained by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), surface profilometry, hardnesstesting and X-ray diffraction residual stress measurement. The fatigue limits weredetermined using rotating-bending by means of the staircase method.The fatigue limits predicted by the N-R fatigue model were compared with the results ofthe fatigue tests. There was no agreement between the prediction and observations,indicating that the original form of the N-R model is not appropriate for austeniticstainless steels.In AISI 304L, the surface residual stresses are the dominant parameter, allowingprediction of the effects of machining on fatigue resistance while, the surface roughnessdeveloped by machining has no significant effect. In AISI 316L, the effect of surfaceroughness is found to be negligible, with a weaker effect of surface residual stress thanhas been observed for AISI 304L.Crack nuclei in run-out (>107 cycles) fatigue tests were observed to arrest at twins andmartensite packets, developed by fatigue in AISI 316L and AISI 304L, respectively.Good agreement with experiments was achieved by using a modification to the fatiguemodel, which takes account of the observed effect of the plastic deformation on themicrostructure.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Form of thesis:
Type of submission:
Degree type:
PhD
Degree programme:
PhD Materials Science
Publication date:
Location:
Manchester, UK
Total pages:
296
Abstract:
The effect of surface finish on fatigue limit of two types of austenitic stainless steels(AISI 304L and AISI 316L) has been investigated. Fatigue specimens having twodifferent surface conditions were obtained by changing the final cutting condition;annealing was performed to separate the residual stress effects from surface roughness.Electropolished samples were tested as a reference for each material.A generic mechanistic model for short fatigue crack propagation proposed by Navarroand Rios (N-R model) was implemented to assess its suitability for predicting thefatigue behaviour of specimens with various controlled surface conditions, obtained bymachining. The surface/material properties required to implement this model wereobtained by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), surface profilometry, hardnesstesting and X-ray diffraction residual stress measurement. The fatigue limits weredetermined using rotating-bending by means of the staircase method.The fatigue limits predicted by the N-R fatigue model were compared with the results ofthe fatigue tests. There was no agreement between the prediction and observations,indicating that the original form of the N-R model is not appropriate for austeniticstainless steels.In AISI 304L, the surface residual stresses are the dominant parameter, allowingprediction of the effects of machining on fatigue resistance while, the surface roughnessdeveloped by machining has no significant effect. In AISI 316L, the effect of surfaceroughness is found to be negligible, with a weaker effect of surface residual stress thanhas been observed for AISI 304L.Crack nuclei in run-out (>107 cycles) fatigue tests were observed to arrest at twins andmartensite packets, developed by fatigue in AISI 316L and AISI 304L, respectively.Good agreement with experiments was achieved by using a modification to the fatiguemodel, which takes account of the observed effect of the plastic deformation on themicrostructure.
Thesis main supervisor(s):
Language:
en

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:81958
Created by:
Al-Shahrani, Saeed
Created:
25th May, 2010, 11:35:44
Last modified by:
Al-Shahrani, Saeed
Last modified:
7th April, 2011, 10:31:08

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.