Related resources
Full-text held externally
- DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.004
- PMID: 20434861
- UKPMCID: 20434861
Search for item elsewhere
University researcher(s)
Academic department(s)
A paradigm shift in the analysis of bitemarks.
Forensic science international. 2010;201(1-3):38-44.
Access to files
Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:
Full-text held externally
- DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.004
- PMID: 20434861
- UKPMCID: 20434861
Abstract
There have been major changes in the approach to and philosophy surrounding bite-mark analyses in recent years. This has resulted in a paradigm shift. Concentrating on three important areas, this review aims to describe the shift in the bite-mark paradigm following recent research studies, the increasing numbers of wrongful convictions that are associated at least in part with bite-mark analyses, and the publication of the United States National Academy of Sciences report entitled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. The article provides an update on the current context and status of bite-mark analysis. Given the present combination of critical elements, a new level of caution that includes the use of a careful scientific approach to casework, increased reproducibility of conclusions by independent analysts, and hypothesis-driven research is needed. Bitemarks have the ability to exonerate the innocent, protect children from harmful caregivers, and convict the guilty. However, they also may be the enemy of natural justice.