18
December
2017
|
17:00
Europe/London

Self-injury more about coping than a cry for help

New research has revealed that most people who harm themselves do it as a way to deal with their emotional pain, rather than a cry for help.

While people do harm themselves as a way to communicate with, or to influence the behaviour of, others, only about 23% to 33% of people who self-injure say they do this.

Clinical Psychologist Dr Peter Taylor, from The University of Manchester found that between 63% and 78% of non-suicidal people who self-injure do it as a short-term strategy to ease their emotional distress.

However, though self-injuring may work for short periods, the effect can be short lived, and make matters worse in the long term.

Non suicidal self-injury affects around 13%–17% of adolescents and young adults. Studies say it is associated with a range of psychological difficulties including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Though many use it as a way to cope, it is also a risk factor for later suicide.

The study was carried out by researchers from The University of Manchester, University of Liverpool, Leeds Beckett University, and Edith Cowan University in Australia.

We believe this research has important implications on how self-injury is managed. Ideally, clinicians would seek to personalise the appropriate therapy to the specific reasons behind the behaviour
Dr Peter Taylor

Dr Taylor and the team combined the data from all published studies on the topic, excluding prisoners and military or ex-military samples. The research review comprised over10,000 people from 46 different studies and is published in the Journal of Affective Disorders.

Dr Taylor said: “Non suicidal self-injury is a concern because it can often signal that a person is facing a great deal of distress and may not have found other ways to cope.

“Our research supports the idea that people engage in non-suicidal self-injury for a variety of different reasons. These reasons may reflect different causes and treatment needs”.

He added: “We believe this research has important implications on how self-injury is managed. Ideally, clinicians would seek to personalise the appropriate therapy to the specific reasons behind the behaviour.

“Problems coping with emotions, for example, may be helped by ’Emotional Regulation Group Therapy’ or ‘Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT)’ whereas self-criticism and shame may be better treated by Compassion Focussed Therapy.”

“But unfortunately, most practitioners only have limited access to different talking therapies."

The paper ‘A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury’ is published in the Journal of Affective Disorders.

Share this release