New report on Attitudes Towards LegalTech Adoption in the UK
MIOIR researchers led a study funded by the Manchester Law and Technology Initiative into “Attitudes Towards LegalTech Adoption in the UK” with UCL and The Law Society.
Legal professionals ‘sitting on the fence’ in terms of embracing new technologies
A lack of understanding by, and encouragement from, management is proving a barrier to the uptake of technologies like artificial intelligence in the legal services sector, according to a new report.
The report, which was launched at a conference this week at AMBS, has been published by The University of Manchester, UCL (University College London), and the Law Society.
The project was led by Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Professor of Strategic Management and Behavioural Science at AMBS. He said:
This report shows that a lot of legal professionals are still sitting on the fence when it comes to embracing new technologies. They are not completely resistant, but encouragement and support on the part of senior leaders and key decision makers is badly needed if we are going to see the legal services industry keep pace with other professional service industries, which are considerably further down the line in the adoption of new technologies with similar capabilities.
Use of lawtech
The survey of more than 650 solicitors found that less than a third use lawtech daily. Lawtech encompasses a range of technologies that aim to support, supplement or replace traditional methods for legal services.
These technologies range from lower-level ones with the potential to improve the efficiency of service delivery, such as the use of legal databases and automation of document assembly/discovery, online portals, virtual assistants, and contract review software, to advanced chatbots and the latest advances in predictive artificial intelligence, which have the potential to displace human judgment and decision making.
More than one third of the sample said they do not use lawtech at all, or do so highly infrequently. Those that are using the new technologies are doing so primarily in routine administrative tasks, such as managing legal databases, rather than utilising the more cutting-edge developments to supplant their expert judgment in respect of complex issues.
While respondents acknowledged the benefits lawtech can bring in terms of improving service quality and workflow efficiency, the report found a significant lack of confidence in using it effectively at an individual level. Nearly a quarter of respondents disagreed with the suggestion that learning to use lawtech would be easy.
Those surveyed also failed to equate the benefits lawtech brings to the wider business with benefits that might enhance their own career prospects. Over half said they feel lawtech increases their productivity, but around six in 10 actively disagreed that using lawtech will increase their chances of getting promoted, and more than eight in ten disagreed that using lawtech will increase their chances of a pay rise.
However, the findings indicate that there is a growing willingness to engage with lawtech despite these concerns. Sizeable proportions of the sample believe that they would be capable of performing jobs and tasks using lawtech if someone else helped them to get started (59%), or were available in the event that they needed help (60%).
Added Professor Hodgkinson:
Ultimately, it comes down to whether the people at the top of the business consider lawtech to be a strategic priority, and as such, worthy of investment – not only in terms of the purchase of new kit, but equally crucially in the form of the requisite knowledge and skills development, together with the cognitive and emotional support required to ensure that employees feel valued and psychologically equipped to face the significant change journey ahead.
Dr Karen Nokes, a Lecturer in Law at UCL Faculty of Laws, said:
The legal profession is at a crossroads, with new technologies that promise to transform virtually every aspect of the legal services sector starting to gather pace. However, our report suggests that this transformation might not be as rapid as some would think.
It is clear that there is a business case for adopting lawtech, but people are not necessarily equating this to how it will benefit them personally. Senior managers and leaders within law firms need to think about creating a clear connection between the benefits to the organization and the benefits to the individual, if they want to get the buy-in they need from their professional colleagues.
The project was funded by The University of Manchester Lawtech Initiative, a partnership between The University of Manchester – spanning Alliance Manchester Business School, the Department of Computer Science, and the Law School –and several law firms.
This week’s conference featured presentations from the report authors, as well as a discussion of the findings from Tanja Podinic from The Law Society, and also from UK legaltech expert Jenifer swallow.
Read the new report on attitudes towards LawTech adoption.