- UCAS course code
- LL23
- UCAS institution code
- M20
Course unit details:
How to Conduct Politics Research
Unit code | POLI20902 |
---|---|
Credit rating | 20 |
Unit level | Level 2 |
Teaching period(s) | Semester 2 |
Available as a free choice unit? | Yes |
Overview
In this module students are taught the basics of research design across the different sub-disciplines within politics and IR – political theory, comparative politics, and international politics. When we ask questions about the world, each of these fields have developed distinctive approaches to answering questions in ways that seem valid on their terms. We explore the different ways that each branch of political science has tried to generate ‘good’ knowledge on major issues in politics and IR. The module is also a chance to try out some of your own preliminary empirical research on a topic of your choice related to the disciplinary area.
This will include; selecting research questions, conducting literature reviews and engaging with academic literature, core research methodologies in international, comparative and political theory, quantitative and qualitative research techniques. Students on this module will choose a research question, learn how to analyse different sources and data, and write an independent research report on their chosen topic. This topic can be drawn from a wide range of themes across Politics and IR. It is taught by a team of academics across the Politics department with specialisms in the sub-fields.
Pre/co-requisites
Unit title | Unit code | Requirement type | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction to International Politics | POLI10601 | Pre-Requisite | Compulsory |
Introduction to Political Theory | POLI10702 | Pre-Requisite | Compulsory |
Introduction to Comparative Politics | POLI10201 | Pre-Requisite | Compulsory |
Introduction to Comparative Politics | POLI10202 | Pre-Requisite | Compulsory |
Aims
The aims of the module are to develop understanding of core research design and methods. Students will start to develop their intellectual independence by choosing a topic from a proposed list. The module offers an opportunity to investigate the benefits and drawbacks of different research methods. This could help later on when choosing what to do for 3rd year dissertation. It is also fascinating to learn how differently scholars have approached how to produce knowledge.
Students will learn the main elements of research design and how to set up and conduct
an independent research project. Through large group lectures and smaller tutorials
students will be exposed to a selection of theoretical, conceptual and methodological approaches as
well as different primary and secondary sources employed by scholars of Politics.
Tutorials will be specifically employed to debate and discuss the different elements of
research design and practice using and assess different sources and methods.
Midway through the course, students will be asked to select one question out of a set
list of possible topics covering a wide range of themes. They will write a short rationale for
selecting the question, its significance for the study of politics and the type of research
method, sources and analysis they intend to employ. This is a necessary step, but is not part of the final grade.
Students will then write a short annotated bibliography that will help them develop their literature review in the final assignment. This is worth 25% of the final mark.
For their final assignment (worth 75%) students will write an extended analytical research essay exploring how best to design a research project answering their chosen question. They
will be asked to include a literature review discussing the different approaches/perspectives on the topic and will assess how to navigate this debate.
Students will choose a methodological approach and explain how and why they
made this choice (why this is the appropriate approach to answer their chosen question)
and will also address why other approaches are less useful. Students will identify relevant
sources (such as documents and reports, media sources, video interviews, surveys and
primary texts and consider their inclusion in a research project. They may make some
preliminary conclusions.
Learning outcomes
Student will
• Develop a deeper understanding of the various methodological approaches in politics and a better understanding of the drawbacks and benefits of these approaches and of
different sources used in research analysis.
• Develop their ability to assess, contrast and compare primary and secondary sources used for independent research.
• Develop their analytical skills including an ability to assess, contrast and compare primary and secondary sources used for independent research.
• Develop communication skills including an ability to effectively articulate coherent,
• critically-informed analysis to a small and larger groups as well as the ability to interact with colleagues in a constructive manner.
• Develop their writing skills including an ability to express concise, logical arguments in written form.
Transferable skills and personal qualities
The module encourages the development of both research skills and transferable skills including time management, problem solving and other organizational skills. These skills will help develop the students’ CVs with the view to increase their employability in a wide range of careers.
Employability skills
- Problem solving
- Research
- Other
- Time management and organisational skills
Assessment methods
Final Project 3000 (75%) Annotated Bibliography 1000 (25%) |
Feedback methods
Politics staff will provide feedback on written work within 15 working days of submission.
Assessments submitted through Turnitin will receive feedback via Blackboard. This will include suggestions about ways in which you could improve your work in future
Recommended reading
Thomas, Gary. 2013.How to Do Your Research Project: A Guide for Students in Education and Applied Social Sciences. Second Edition edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Gschwend, Thomas, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2007.Research Design in Political Science: How to Practice What They Preach. Palgrave Macmillan.
King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994.Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton; Chichester: Princeton University Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 1989.The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California.
Rossi, Peter H., James D. Wright, and Andy B. Anderson. 2013.Handbook of Survey Research. Academic Press.
Teaching staff
Staff member | Role |
---|---|
David Richards | Unit coordinator |